| Model Number |
321.03.350 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
05/13/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4) initial report.Additional information, including post primary and pre revision x-rays, operative notes (primary and revision), patient activity level, weight and medical history, whether the patient followed correct post-op protocol, whether the patient experienced any slips / falls or other trauma post primary, whether the revising surgeon have any thoughts about what may have been causing the instability and an update on the patient following the revision, has been requested in order to progress with the investigation of this event, and if received, will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.The appropriate device details have been provided and the relevant device manufacturing records will be identified and reviewed.Please note: this report is filed with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occurred outside of the usa.The submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the device, reporting entity, entity's representative or distributor caused or contributed to this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Trinity dual mobility revision of the cup, cocr liner, ecima insert and biolox delta ceramic head after approximately 5 years and 9 months due to instability.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Trinity dual mobility revision of the cup, cocr liner, ecima insert and biolox delta ceramic head after approximately 5 years and 9 months due to instability.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4) final report.Additional information, including post primary and pre revision x-rays, operative notes (primary and revision), patient activity level, weight and medical history, whether the patient followed correct post-op protocol, whether the patient experienced any slips / falls or other trauma post primary, whether the revising surgeon have any thoughts about what may have been causing the instability and an update on the patient following the revision, was requested in order to progress with the investigation of this event, however, not all information could be provided and thus the scope of the investigation was limited.The appropriate device details were provided and the relevant device manufacturing records have been identified and reviewed.All parts associated with these records conformed to material and dimensional specification at the time of manufacture.Based on the available information, no further investigation can be conducted and thus the root cause of the reported instability could not be determined.Therefore, this case is now considered closed, however, should any additional information be provided then this case may be re-opened for further investigation.Please note: this report is filed with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occurred outside of the usa.The submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the device, reporting entity, entity's representative or distributor caused or contributed to this event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|