| Model Number |
VXAK0007 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Advance (2920); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Cardiac Perforation (2513); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
05/13/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.We are unable to provide the complete unique identifier (udi) at the time of the submission of this report, as it was not yet available.If additional details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported a perforation, pericardial effusion (pe) leading to cardiac tamponade occurred.The procedure was cancelled.During a watchman procedure, a versacross connect laac kit was selected for use.The physician attempted to go transeptal, advancing the wire multiple times.When watching on transesophageal echocardiogram (tee), there was visible tenting and radio frequency was administered.The wire did not cross into the left atrium so another attempt was made.The septum was slippery causing difficulty staying put on the septum.The procedure continued on trying to cannulate the appendage when an effusion was discovered.The effusion was measuring 2.5cm surrounding the heart.A pericardiocentesis began and when wire access was lost during that time the surgeon was called.Pericardial window was started and got 300 ml off before bag was attached.The patients chest was then cracked open on the table.The appendage was clipped.The patient remains stable and has throughout the entire procedure.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported a perforation, pericardial effusion (pe) leading to cardiac tamponade occurred.The procedure was cancelled.During a watchman procedure, a versacross connect laac kit was selected for use.The physician attempted to go transeptal, advancing the wire multiple times.When watching on transesophageal echocardiogram (tee), there was visible tenting and radio frequency was administered.The wire did not cross into the left atrium so another attempt was made.The septum was slippery causing difficulty staying put on the septum.The procedure continued on trying to cannulate the appendage when an effusion was discovered.The effusion was measuring 2.5cm surrounding the heart.A pericardiocentesis began and when wire access was lost during that time the surgeon was called.Pericardial window was started and got 300 ml off before bag was attached.The patients chest was then cracked open on the table.The appendage was clipped.The patient remains stable and has throughout the entire procedure.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).It was further confirmed that the patient did well after, went home and has already been seen in clinic.He is doing well and having no issues.There was tenting and the difficulty noted was with the patient's septum, which was very thick and stiff, making it difficult to maneuver the sheath once we crossed into the left atrium.The complication was noted while in the the la and when the tee physician noticed the effusion the procedure was stopped immediately and a pericardiocentesis was attempted.There were multiple drop downs and the pigtail wire had become misshapen.The physician believes this was part of the problem along with the patient's septum.The ct surgeon found that there was a small hole in the left atrium.The physician held pressure on the site with gauze until it was resolved.The patient had his appendage clipped by the ct surgeon while was in.Act was therapeutic during the procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Due to additional information received, this supplemental report is being submitted for the update field describe event or problem (b5), in section b - adverse event/product pro.A separated report for versacross dilator is being submitted.It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.We are unable to provide the complete unique identifier (udi) at the time of the submission of this report, as it was not yet available.If additional details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|