• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU225
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Impairment (2138); Visual Disturbances (2140); Posterior Capsule Opacification (4807)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4 and a6: unknown/ not provided.Section b3: date of event: unknown, information not provided.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded lens was explanted due to the patient experiencing difficulty driving and working.On the first day, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (ucdva) was 20/15, and the post-operative manifest refraction (mrx) was plano sphere.At one week, the ucdva dropped to 20/50+1, with only trace posterior capsule opacification (pco) noted to be present, which showed a myopic shift to -1.25 + 0.50 x 126.The iol was exchanged for another j&j diu225 with a power of 19.5.The patient's best corrected visual acuity (bscva) pre-operatively was 20/25-2, and post-operatively it improved to 20/15.No additional information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: device date returned to manufacturer: june 12, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint device reveal that the complaint lens was received cut into three pieces and coated in an unknown liquid.The lens pieces were cleaned revealing no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue reported.The complaint issues were not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specification.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22128716
Report Number3012236936-2025-000141
Device Sequence Number7357241
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474747142
UDI-Public(01)05050474747142(17)260729
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/25/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/29/2026
Device Model NumberDIU225
Device Catalogue NumberDIU225U205
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/08/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/17/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/02/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/25/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/29/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-