|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
4708060 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
| Date of Event |
10/26/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported infection and thrombosis as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that sometime later port placement procedure, the patient developed with unspecified infection and thrombosis.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: although the physical device was not returned for evaluation, a medical record was provided for review.Medical record alleges that, the patient underwent an implantable port placement procedure via right subclavian vein using a powerport for iv fluid delivery as part of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome treatment.Approximately, five months and fourteen days later the patient was reported with staphylococcus aureus infection.Subsequently, the patient was planned for port removal.A previous incision was performed, and the pocket was entered.There was no purulent or turbid fluid noted.The pocket reservoir itself was cultured and submitted for gram stain and culture.The port catheter was dissected free from the fibrin sheath, and the fibrous sheath around the catheter was incised, and the catheter was removed.The fibrin sheath was oversewn with suture.The catheter tip was submitted for culture, and the reservoir was sent for a definitive culture.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported device appeared to trigger rejection issue.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint can be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B3, b5, g3, h6 (device, component, method, result)
section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that, on (b)(6)2017, a patient underwent port placement via the right subclavian vein for intravenous fluid delivery related to postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.Approximately five months and fourteen days later, on (b)(6) 2017, the patient was diagnosed with bacterial infection.Additionally, it was reported that the patient was diagnosed with thrombosis.Subsequently, the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|