|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL XTRA BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
THPX255 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Product Quality Problem (1506); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: n/a.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a hair was found inside the packaging of a 255cc mentor memorygel xtra breast implant prosthesis during a primary breast augmentation surgery.Additionally, it was indicated that the two layer plastic packaging was difficult to open and separate from one another was super glued together.However, the surgery commenced without any reported delays and a new implant was used to complete the implantation.No adverse events or patient consequences were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, the mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.On (b)(6) 2025, mentor completed an evaluation on an image that was provided of the suspect medical device.Photo evaluation: upon visual evaluation of the image provided in the complaint, foreign matter is perceived in the implant.A photo was provided by the customer, and a black fiber that appears to be a hair is perceived between the inner and outer thermoform.Regarding the packaging being difficult to open, this could not be confirmed since there is no evidence.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On december 09, 2025, mentor completed an evaluation on the returned device.Device evaluation: mentor conducted a visual inspection of the device.Visual analysis of the returned device determined that no hairs or foreign matters were found in/on the breast implant, also, the device was received without it¿s packaging and thermoform.However, a photo was provided by the customer, and a black fiber that appears to be a hair is perceived between the inner and outer thermoform.The hair may have been lost during shipment of the device.Regarding the packaging being difficult to open, this could not be confirmed since there is no evidence and the returned device was received without thermoform.Based on the information currently available, a notification was sent to mentor's manufacturing team for further investigation.The mentor microbiology department provided the sterility assurance records of the implanted device.The lot met all the sterilization parameters required to provide sterility assurance prior to release for distribution.In conclusion, the foreign matter (hair) reported cannot be confirmed as a manufacturing defect.The physical product was requested for further investigations and evaluations, where no hair was found in the device.This complaint cannot be ruled as a manufacturing defect as no hair was physically confirmed inside the device or evidence of packaging being difficult to open.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|