| Model Number |
UM-878 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter intraoperatively during suturing, the two packets of thread broke.The sutures were handled with the same force but it seems to break more easily.There was no patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10 concomitant medical products: um-878, um-878 biosyn* 2-0 vio 75cm gu46 x36 (lot#:d4c3807y) medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, intraoperatively, during suturing, the two packets of thread broke.The sutures were handled with the same force but it seems to break more easily.A new product from the same box was used to resolve the issue.There was no patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: b5, g3.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: g3, h3, h6.H3 evaluation summary: "medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the suture was disengaged from any needle.The suture was measured at 32 1/4 inches with aluminum rule, calibrated asset nh02505.Microscopic inspection of the suture ends noted no damage.The foil pouch was inspected with light assisted microscopy with no abnormalities.Functional testing found that the tensile strength of absorbable sutures may be affected by degradation of the suture and/or damage during use after the product has been opened and may impact the validity of any test results.Light assisted microscopic inspection of the breathable pouch noted no breaches or damage.The needle was properly parked in the retainer.Inspection of the retainer noted the suture was properly wound and no damage to the retainer.A tactile inspection of the suture was performed with no abnormalities.The foil pouch was inspected with light assisted microscopy with no abnormalities.The breathable pouch was opened without any tears of the tyvek packaging.The suture was removed from the retainer without any difficulty.A simple knot was performed on the suture and the knot was pulled tight.The suture ends were loaded onto an instron machine by clamping the ends with cord yarn grips.No suture breaking or fraying was noted while handling/loading the suture into the instron machine.The instron then pulled the suture at a rate of 300 mm/min until the suture broke.The breaking point load force was measured and were found to meet ep minimum individual specifications.The ep minimum specification was used as only one representative sample was returned for evaluation.Based on the results of the simple knot test, the representative sample tested satisfactory.It was reported that the thr ead broke.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: progressive loss of tensile strength and eventual absorption of the absorbable sutures occurs by means of hydrolysis.This loss is triggered when exposed to the environment or clinical application.Damage during use may result in inadequate sample length to perform testing and/or deformation of the suture contributing to a loss in tensile strength.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|