|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT CLEARVUE ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1668362 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Unspecified Infection (1930); Sepsis (2067); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Drug Resistant Bacterial Infection (4553)
|
| Date of Event |
01/25/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that sometime later port placement procedure, the patient allegedly developed with unspecified infection and thrombosis.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported infection and thrombosis as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that, on (b)(6) 2022, a patient underwent the port placement via the right internal jugular vein for chemotherapy related to bladder cancer.Approximately two months and seven days later, on (b)(6) 2023, a computed tomography (ct) scan revealed pulmonary emboli and thrombosis.Further, approximately twenty seven days later, on (b)(6) 2023, the patient was diagnosed with sepsis and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) bacteremia, which was confirmed through blood cultures.Subsequently, on (b)(6) 2023, the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient remains unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation, medical record was provided for review.Medical record alleges that, the patient was implanted with clear vue isp implantable port for chemotherapy of bladder cancer via right internal jugular vein with fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance.A final fluoroscopic image of the entire assembly was obtained, showing no kinks and confirming the catheter tip remained at the aortocaval junction.Two months and seven days later, a ct scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with contrast was performed, which revealed multiple bilateral segmental pulmonary emboli.The patient was also reported to have presented with sepsis.On the same day, blood cultures obtained from both the port and peripheral bloodstream were positive for methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) bacteremia.Based on these findings, the physician recommended removal of the implanted port.Subsequently, the port was removed after twenty eight days.The port and catheter were removed intact.Therefore, it can be confirmed that the patient had multiple bilateral segmental pulmonary emboli, sepsis and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) bacteremia.However, the relationship to the port is unknown.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B3, b5, g3, h6 (patient, component, method, result).Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|