| Catalog Number |
60-2450-120 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Overheating of Device (1437)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
|
| Date of Event |
05/19/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported device is being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the device evaluation and complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A customer reported that the device, 60-2450-120, system 2450 120 vac 50/60 hz electrosurigcal unit, was used in a breast lumpectomy; with sentinel node dissection and lymphatic mapping procedure on (b)(6) 2025, and ¿patient received two dime sized areas of a flat white colored area that almost resembled a blister but no fluid under it from conmed 2450 esu & elctrosrgical pencil¿.The procedure was completed without the use of an alternate device, the ¿area was dressed with antibioticointment and a telfa dressing¿ and the patient¿s status was reported as ¿good¿.Further assessment found a medline pencil was in use.The event occurred "just after incision was made.Md was cauterizing and she was using the sponge to mop up bleeders and this is when they noticed a raytec was burning.The physician says she felt the pencil was running 'a bit hot¿ that day, so they turned the settings down a little.On this particular case the settings were set to spray at 45/45.This was not her normal setting and the staff said they did not set it to that setting.They feel the spray button must have been pushed accidentally.Md performing the surgery documented that patient sustained a burn.In my interview with the surgeon she stated to me this could be a 1st or 2nd degree burn.On post op follow up visit on (b)(6), md did not document anything about a burn to the patient.States that patient is healing well and no signs and symptoms of infection.As of on (b)(6) patient is doing well with no issues per md documentation.Her next follow up visit will be in 5 months and will have a bilateral mammogram.No new orders for medications/treatment were given." this report is being raised due to the reported injury of a first- or second-degree burn incurred by the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An evaluation of the returned device found no fault.The unit met all specifications; however, an additional problem was found: the front bezel is broken.The preventive maintenance was completed.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.The service history was reviewed and no relationship to this complaint was found.(b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised that the system 2450 is capable of causing physiological effects, including burns to the patient or operator.The electrodes of recently activated accessories may be hot enough to burn the patient or ignite surgical drapes or other flammable material.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A customer reported that the device, 60-2450-120, system 2450 120 vac 50/60 hz electrosurigcal unit, was used in a breast lumpectomy; with sentinel node dissection and lymphatic mapping procedure on (b)(6) 2025, and "patient received two dime sized areas of a flat white colored area that almost resembled a blister but no fluid under it from conmed 2450 esu and elctrosrgical pencil".The procedure was completed without the use of an alternate device, the "area was dressed with antibioticointment and a telfa dressing" and the patient¿s status was reported as "good".Further assessment found a medline pencil was in use.The event occurred, "just after incision was made.Md was cauterizing and she was using the sponge to mop up bleeders and this is when they noticed a raytec was burning.The physician says she felt the pencil was running 'a bit hot¿ that day, so they turned the settings down a little.On this particular case the settings were set to spray at 45/45.This was not her normal setting and the staff said they did not set it to that setting.They feel the spray button must have been pushed accidentally.Md performing the surgery documented that patient sustained a burn.N my interview with the surgeon she stated to me this could be a 1st or 2nd degree burn.On post op follow up visit on 5/30, md did not document anything about a burn to the patient.States that patient is healing well and no signs and symptoms of infection.As of 5/30 patient is doing well with no issues per md documentation.Her next follow up visit will be in 5 months and will have a bilateral mammogram.No new orders for medications/treatment were given.".This report is being raised due to the reported injury of a first- or second-degree burn incurred by the patient.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|