|
|
| Model Number |
1001780J |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Off-Label Use (1494); Material Separation (1562); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the great saphenous vein.During the use of a 3cm 014 ht balance middle weight guide wire (gw) the tip of the wire was noted to separate.The separated portion was left in the anatomy and a compressive coban bandage was applied to the upper thigh along with a compression sock to ensure the separated portion of the wire would not migrate.After the location of the separated wire was confirmed under ultrasound the patient was transferred to another hospital.There were no adverse patient sequela nor clinically significant delay in procedure reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.H6: medical device problem code 1494 - incorrect anatomy.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis.Production record and corrective and preventive actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.The guide wire was used in the great saphenous vein.The instructions for use (ifu) for hi-torque guide wire states: all hi-torque guide wires are intended to facilitate the placement of balloon dilatation catheters during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (ptca) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).It is unknown if the reported ifu deviation contributed to the reported difficulties.Based on the information received, a definitive cause for the reported difficulty could not be determined.The subsequent treatment appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.Factors that may contribute to difficulty advancing the guide wire include, but are not limited to, outer diameter of the guide wire, challenging anatomy, device support, buildup of procedural contaminants, user technique, and/or damage to the guide wire which likely led to the reported material separation.Based on the results of the complaint investigation, there is no indication a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling of the device.E1 correction: first, last name updated.E1 correction: title updated.E3 correction: occupation updated.E4 correction: initial report sent to fda updated from no to yes.G2 correction: report source updated.H6 correction: health effect - clinical code 2687 removed, 4582, 4624, h6 correction: medical device problem code 2524 added.Attachment: medsun report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Subsequent the initially reported information, additional information was received and it was noted that the balance middle weight (bmw) guide wire was loaded through the support catheter to the lower left gsv and slowly advanced to the thigh area under ultrasound guidance.Subsequently, the catheter was pushed over the bmw in an attempt to guide it into the left gsv rather than an accessory vein.At this point, the catheter tip was immediately below the left knee, but further advancement was impossible due to resistance.Attempts were made to reposition the bmw, and ultimately the guide wire was removed; however, during this process, the terminal flexible part of the bmw guide wire separated from the stiff shaft and remained in the mid-lower left thigh area of the gsv.The stiff portion of the guide wire was removed intact.The failure of the wire device was recognized, with two parts of the guide wire having broken apart, one remaining in the patient¿s anatomy.After the position of the separated portion was held by coban bandaged and a compression sock, the patient was transferred to another hospital where the separated wire was surgically removed via a vessel cut down.There were no adverse patient sequela nor clinically significant delay in procedure reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|