• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. NV GXL LINER NEUTRAL, 32MM ID GROUP 1 CUPS; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. NV GXL LINER NEUTRAL, 32MM ID GROUP 1 CUPS; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 130-32-51
Medical Device Problem Codes Naturally Worn (2988); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Cyst(s) (1800); Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Osteolysis (2377); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 05/13/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient, who had a hip implanted, was revised to a 140-32-51 cc inlay vitamin e neutral, ø 32, gr.1 b135501.No further information known at this time.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The reported event was unable to be confirmed due to limited information received from the customer.No device was returned for evaluation; further, photographs and/or radiograph images were not provided for review.Operative notes and/or medical records were not provided for review of usage/technique.A definitive root cause was unable to be determined as the necessary information to adequately investigate the reported event was not provided.A review of complaint history determined that no further action is required as no trends were identified.The reason for the revision reported cannot be confirmed from the information provided but may be due to inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall, wear, osteolysis, loosening, infection, fracture, instability/dislocation, leg length discrepancy, and/or patient related factors.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and images, radiographs, and relevant clinical information were not provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were added/corrected: d1, d4, d6a, g1, h4, h6: type of investigation.The most likely cause for the revision reported is prosthesis wear and osteolysis due to a combination of the risk factors: such as use error, implant positioning, implant size selection, and patient factors (fitness for surgery, biomechanics, activity level and local tissue oxidation potential).However, this cannot be confirmed because the devices were not available for evaluation and no images or radiographs were provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: a3, b2, b3, b4, b7, d4, d6a, d6b, d10, h6, h11.D10: 180-01-48 - crown cup, cluster-hole gr.48 (b)(6).If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Event or Problem Description
As part of the manufacturer's recall, the patient presented for a follow-up examination due to increasing discomfort/pain in her thigh.X-ray and ct scans revealed significant decentering of the prosthetic head and unusually large osteolytic lesions in the acetabulum, indicative of inlay wear.This was addressed during an inlay replacement procedure using a specially approved vitamin e-reinforced inlay.(xle, neutral liner, group 1, 32 mm).The findings were verified.During the revision surgery, in addition to replacing the inlay, the integrity of the acetabular socket was confirmed, the cysts in the acetabular bed were curetted and filled with hydroxylapatite + calcium (cerament bone void filler), and the prosthetic head was replaced.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NV GXL LINER NEUTRAL, 32MM ID GROUP 1 CUPS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville 32653
3525541928
MDR Report Key22155205
Report Number1038671-2025-02241
Device Sequence Number7292459
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier10885862207074
UDI-Public10885862207074
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K121392
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/27/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/05/2021
Device Catalogue Number130-32-51
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/14/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/27/2025
12/22/2025
02/27/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/05/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/11/2025
01/14/2026
02/27/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/10/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H11.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
-
-