|
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC UNID PATIENT SPECIFIC IMPLANTS; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
B33226099-02 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/15/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Information was received from healthcare provider (hcp) via a manufacturer representative regarding a patient having t10-pelvis posterior fixation and fusion procedure, with l2/l5 laminectomy and l5/s1 tlif for indication of stenosis, back pain, and sagittal imbalance.It was reported that the surgeon was bending the unid rod with in situ benders to seat the rod into a lower lumbar screw, and rod broke during this maneuver.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d9, h3, h6 h3.Device evaluation summary: product analysis #(b)(4): part # b33226099-02 lot # 0231332350 visual inspection confirmed the rod was returned broken.Optical inspection revealed some wear and indentions on it from the seating and tightening of the set screw.Macroscopic inspection of the fracture surface revealed material smearing and very rigid fracture surface.The ends may have been cut during the removal process.After implant review there were no signs of preexisting damage/cracks that could contribute to the rod breaking.The rod breakage appears to from overload.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|