|
|
| Catalog Number |
222205 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/30/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: device history review: there was no non-conformance regarding this lot.The product has not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics, however a photo was provided for review.¿ visual inspection of the returned photo found that the anchor was still attached to the inserter and broken at the distal end, the anchor had foreign matter, presumably biological matter.No other anomalies were noted.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of 4.5 healix peek anch.W/ocord would have contributed to the complained device issue.¿ based on the investigation findings, the potential cause for the broken anchor can be traced to off axis insertion and levering during insertion.As per instructions for use, inserting the awl or drill to less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion may result in anchor fracture.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a rotator cuff repair surgery, it was observed that the 4.5 healix peek anch.W/ocord device anchor was broken off.Another device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: the product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection found that the device had the anchor still attached to the inserter and broken at the distal end.The anchor had foreign matter, presumably biological matter.Not all the broken fragments were returned for evaluation.No other anomalies were noted.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of 4.5 healix peek anch.W/ocord would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure.The possible root cause can be associated with off axis insertion and levering during insertion.As per instructions for use, inserting the awl less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion, may result in anchor fracture, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|