|
|
| Catalog Number |
7206010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/20/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a shoulder scope with a sad procedure, metal debridement was seen in the joint after using the 5.5mm full radius blade.The metal debris was suspected to have originated from the blade while it was shaving hard bone.The metal debris were removed from inside the patient using the 4.5 bonecutter on oscillate mode.The procedure was completed with a s+n back up device.There was a surgical delay of 1-2 minutes and no further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference case-(b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation with another device.A visual evaluation showed that they were received together without original packaging and no identification of lot numbers.The color scheme of the devices matches the print.Both inner blades have scoring in multiple locations from debris.Bio debris present.A functional testing found the inner blade rotated freely inside the outer blade when spun by hand.A spin test was performed on each blade manually, no suction or irrigation, over a black mat.A single miniscule metal shaving, verified with a scope, was produced.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include procedural variance, or deviations from established protocols, increasing risks and leading to unintended consequences (insufficient irrigation or an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device).Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|