• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. THREE PEG PATELLA 35MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. THREE PEG PATELLA 35MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 200-02-35
Medical Device Problem Code Naturally Worn (2988)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094); Discomfort (2330); Joint Laxity (4526); Swelling/ Edema (4577); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 03/06/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10: concomitants: (b)(6), 02-010-03-0235 - logic cr femoral cem, left, sz 3.5, (b)(6), 02-012-45-3545 - lgc tibial fit tray cem sz 3.5f / 4.5t, (b)(6), 02-012-48-3513 - logic cr tib insert slope +, sz 3.5, 13 mm.H3 - the revision reported was likely the result of insert and patellar prosthesis wear.The potential root causes of the alleged joint instability, or potential loosening/malalignment of the femoral and/or tibial component cannot be confirmed from the provided information.Additional reasons for the reported revision may be inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Additionally, a contributing factor to the reported wear may have been the result of being packaged in a non-conforming vacuum bag for more than five years.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and were not provided.Should additional relevant information be obtained, a follow-up mdr will be submitted accordingly.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a 71 yo male patient, who had an initial left total knee implanted, underwent a revision procedure, approximately 5 years 5 months post the initial procedure.The patient presented with complaints on their left primary knee including pain and dissatisfaction.It was determined the implanted poly was part of the recall.The patient underwent a poly swap and patella swap.The patient was revised to a size 13mm crc poly for sz 3.5 and a 35mm round 3 peg cemented patella.There were no surgical delays reported.The patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.The device was returned for analysis.The patient has filed a short-form complaint in a coordinated action in alachua county with master case no.(b)(4).The consolidated long form complaint that applies to cases filed in this coordinated action alleges that patients filing suits in this coordinated action were required ¿to undergo revision surgeries due to severe, pain, swelling, and instability¿ due to ¿wear of the polyethylene components and resulting component loosening and/or other failure failures causing serious complications including tissue damage, osteolysis, permanent bone loss, and other injuries.¿ because the patient has filed a short-form complaint in this coordinated action, the patient appears to allege that the patient was injured as a result.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated/corrected: d1, h6.Mdr section codes updated/corrected: c, d.The revision reported was likely the result of tibial insert prosthesis wear, the reported instability, or inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Possible causes for polyethylene wear include malalignment between the implants, high contact stresses during knee flexion, patient-related conditions, instability, inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall that was packaged for longer than 5 years, or any combination of these possibilities.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THREE PEG PATELLA 35MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville, FL 32653
3525541928
MDR Report Key22172188
Report Number1038671-2025-02262
Device Sequence Number7818688
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862039606
UDI-Public10885862039606
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K932690
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/13/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/22/2022
Device Catalogue Number200-02-35
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/24/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/12/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/09/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/13/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/23/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight101 KG
-
-