• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5959812
Medical Device Problem Code Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240)
Date of Event 12/13/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Per information provided: (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent large two ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of two sepramesh ip (device #1 and device #2).Per operative notes, ¿two sepramesh ip (device #1 and device #2) was placed on left and right side and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia, erosion of left side sepramesh ip (device #2) into the small bowel, dense extensive adhesion thereby underwent open repair with explant of the sepramesh ip (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿sepramesh ip (device #2) was removed.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia, adhesion thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with explant of sepramesh ip (device #1) and implant of two ventralight st mesh (device #3 and device #4).Per operative notes, ¿sepramesh ip (device #1) was removed.Two ventralight st mesh (device #3 and device #4) was placed and sutured.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-nov-2010) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol sepramesh ip mesh (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol sepramesh ip mesh (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SEPRAMESH IP
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
8005566756
MDR Report Key22176181
Report Number1213643-2025-00458
Device Sequence Number9520382
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031830
UDI-Public(01)00801741031830(17)121128(10)HUUK0971
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K063739
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Device Explanted Year2019
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/06/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/28/2012
Device Catalogue Number5959812
Device Lot NumberHUUK0971
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/21/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/10/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured11/15/2010
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-