• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH AND DILATORS; FED, ENDOSCOPIC ACCESS OVERTUBE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH AND DILATORS; FED, ENDOSCOPIC ACCESS OVERTUBE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY Back to Search Results
Model Number G19174
Medical Device Problem Code Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/13/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
E1-phone: (b)(6).H3: device has been returned and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
During ureteral stone surgery, the introducer sheath of a flexor ureteral access sheath and dilators was inserted according to the procedure, and it was found that the inner core of the sheath was not easy to pass through the guidewire.The sheath was replaced, and the procedure was continued.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Event or Problem Description
The following information was inadvertently omitted in the previous report.After reviewing the preliminary device failure analysis, the outer sheath was observed to be blocked at distal end of white hub by an unknown material which is hypothesized be the inner lining of the sheath making this event reportable.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: b5 this report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: d4 udi.Investigation evaluation: during ureteral stone surgery, the introducer sheath of a flexor ureteral access sheath and dilators was inserted according to the procedure, and it was found that the inner core of the sheath was not easy to pass through the guidewire.The sheath was replaced, and the procedure was continued.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.After reviewing the preliminary device failure analysis, the outer sheath was observed to be blocked at distal end of white hub by an unknown material which is hypothesized be the inner lining of the sheath making this event reportable.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, manufacturing instructions (mi), and instructions for use (ifu) and a functional test of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The outer sheath was observed to be blocked at distal end of the white hub by an unknown material.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformance's related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with device lot.Because there are no related non-conformance's, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.The product ifu did not provide any information related to the reported issue.Based upon the available information and results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause for the complaint could not be established.The returned device was found to have material blocking the inside diameter (id) of the sheath.The material was likely the inner liner of the sheath that had peeled off.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH AND DILATORS
Common Device Name
FED, ENDOSCOPIC ACCESS OVERTUBE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key22179537
Report Number1820334-2025-00684
Device Sequence Number21150952
Product Code FED
UDI-Device Identifier00827002191747
UDI-Public(01)00827002191747(17)270814(10)16206106
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCN
PMA/510(K) Number
K172217
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG19174
Device Catalogue NumberFUS-095035
Device Lot Number16206106
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/23/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/13/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/15/2025
12/16/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/10/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/15/2025
12/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/14/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-