| Model Number |
ICRC071137 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
05/15/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
An 85-year-old-male was treated for mechanical thrombectomy to remove an occlusion from the right m1 segment.The patient's anatomy was reportedly tortuous.Access was obtained using a third-party access catheter which was advanced to the first big turn in the tortuous loop in distal cervical ica.The zoom 71 was then advanced over a third-party guidewire and zoom 35 to the clot at the proximal m1 segment.The guidewire and zoom 35 catheter were removed.Aspiration was performed with the zoom 71 catheter.As the zoom 71 catheter was retracted under aspiration and the clot was removed.During the removal of the zoom 71 catheter, the physician felt resistance but kept pulling back the catheter.As the physician pulled back on the zoom 71, the catheter broke around 22cm from the distal tip of the catheter.A snare was used to retrieve the broken segment but was unsuccessful.A stent retriever was then used to retrieve the broken segment, however during the retrieval attempt only the distal 2 cm of the broken segment was able to be retrieved.The procedure was completed.A day or two later the patient was returned to the cath lab and the physician attempted to use aspiration and a stent retriever to remove the catheter but was unsuccessful, so he sacrificed the vessel with a plug and coils.No other patient sequelea were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The zoom 71 was retained by the account and not returned for investigation.The manufacturing records for the zoom 71 were reviewed and demonstrated that the product met all the design and manufacturing specifications.Without the device return, the exact root cause for the shaft break could not be determined.Based on the limited case information provided, it was noted that resistance was felt during retraction of the zoom 71 while aspirating the clot.The zoom ifu provides the following warning related to resistance."exercise care when manipulating the device through tortuous anatomy.Do not advance or withdraw the catheters or accessory/adjunctive devices against resistance without careful assessment of the cause under fluoroscopy.If the cause cannot be determined, withdraw all devices as a single unit.Excessive manipulation or torquing the device against resistance may result in damage to the vasculature or the device.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|