|
Manufacturer¿s ref.:(b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, and weight were not provided.Section e.1: the initial reporter phone is not available / reported.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (24h006av) top and sub assembly presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no internal actions related to device manufacture or inspection.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the limited information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported issue documented in the complaint could not be confirmed.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.The exact cause of the event could not be conclusively determined; however, it is possible that circumstances of the procedure and / or device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered later.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during a mechanical thrombectomy procedure targeting an occlusion in the middle cerebral artery (mca) in a patient with a cerebral infarction, the devices were all used in accordance with their respective instructions for use (ifus).When the 5mm x 37mm embotrap iii revascularization device (et309537 / 24h006av) was inserted into the concomitant trevo trak® 21 microcatheter (stryker) after the lesion was crossed, a strong resistance was felt un the microcatheter.Continuous flush was reportedly maintained.The physician removed the devices from the patient¿s anatomy.Upon checking the embotrap and the microcatheter, there were no visible damages noted, and the cause of the issue could not be identified.The embotrap and the microcatheter were replaced and the replacement devices were used without any issue.The procedure was successfully completed.There was no negative impact to the patient.On 10-jun-2025, additional information was received.The information indicated that the reported issue occurred on the device¿s first pass.On 12-jun-2025, additional information was received.The information indicated that the replacement was another 5mm x 37mm embotrap iii device and the replacement microcatheter was another trevo trak 21 microcatheter.The reported issue did not result in any clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|