• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG AS; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG AS; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Model Number NR409Z
Medical Device Problem Code Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The adverse event is filed under aesculap reference number: (b)(4).Investigation results: the device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation of the unit was performed and no parts were returned for failure analysis.Therefore, the investigation was not able to confirm a device issue that could be associated with the reported event.Batch history review: the device history records (dhr) were not able to be reviewed as no lot number was made available.However, all device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.Conclusion and measures/preventative measures: a definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there was an issue with a component of columbus knee system.According to the complaint description, this knee implant was "defective and failed prematurely because the ceramic coated surface fails to properly adhere to the cement".There was postoperative mechanical loosening.It was noted that the surgeon easily removed the implant by hand during the revision.Additional information was not provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The adverse event is filed under aesculap reference no.(b)(4).Investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Update: the medical device was updated to nr409z - as femur extens.Stem 5° d19x117 cem.Less.It is now considered to be an involved component.This refers to the right knee.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The adverse event is filed under aesculap reference no.(b)(4).A.Section - patient data, b5.Description updated, b6.Test results, b7.Medical history, d1&2.Brand name, common device name, product code, d4.Material, batch, expiration date, d6.Explant date, f9.Approximate age of device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
MDR Report Key22205339
Report Number3005673311-2025-00050
Device Sequence Number7667974
Product Code KRO
UDI-Device Identifier04046963176594
UDI-Public(01)04046963176594(11)200427(17)300426(10)52603484
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Importer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/18/2026
Report Date (Section F) 06/09/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberNR409Z
Device Catalogue NumberNR409Z
Device Lot Number52603484
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/22/2025
Device Age70 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/22/2025
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/13/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/27/2025
03/18/2026
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA06/09/2025
-
-