|
Additional information provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.No technical inquiries were received from the customer.One opened probe, with tip protector, in a tray was received for the report.The returned sample was visually inspected and was found to be non-conforming with orange/brown in color foreign material was on the port face.The sample was functionally tested for actuation, aspiration and cut and was found to be conforming for all functional tests.A review of the device history record traceable to the lot number obtained from the device¿s radio frequency identification (rfid) tag, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.The investigation conducted a non-conformance review of the lot number obtained from the device¿s rfid tag.No deviations were identified and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Based on the evaluation of the information and materials received, the investigation concluded that the root cause of the reported event is not determined as the returned sample was conforming for all functional testing.No further investigative or manufacturing actions are warranted at this time due to that the returned sample met specifications.A non-conformance is in progress to investigate the trend identified for actuation and cut issues.Receipt of additional relevant information or supporting materials will prompt a re-evaluation of the complaint investigation.Complaint data for all products is reviewed monthly to monitor for adverse trends.During the last review, adverse trends were observed for the reported product and event combination.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.No further action warranted at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|