• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION VERCISE; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION VERCISE; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS Back to Search Results
Model Number DB-3128-55
Medical Device Problem Codes High impedance (1291); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Fatigue (1849); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Movement Disorder (4412)
Date of Event 02/14/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the deep brain stimulation (dbs) patient experienced body fatigue, pain, inadequate therapy on their left torso and felt the implantable pulse generator (ipg) rotate in pocket site.Functional testing revealed a high impedance contact that was reprogrammed around resulting with adequate therapy and patient symptoms residing.The physician assessed that the patients symptoms were exacerbated while the dbs therapy was on however resided once reprogrammed.The patient underwent a procedure wherein the ipg was repositioned and secured in the pocket site and additional functional testing confirmed high impedance on the lead extension as a result was replaced with another of the same model before completing the procedure.The patient did well post-operatively.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: dbs-ipg-r-mri, upn: m365db12160, model: db-1216, serial: unk, batch: unk.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The returned deep brain stimulation (dbs) vercise lead extension was analyzed and could not confirm the reported allegation with testing of the device.Visual inspection revealed that the dbs lead extension was cleanly cut into two pieces approximately 45 cm from the proximal end.The clean-cut damage is a result of a typical explant procedure, and it is not considered a failure.The lead passed x-ray inspection and the dimensional test.An electrical test could not be performed due to the cut lead body.No other anomalies were identified during the product analysis.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) product label.Additionally, labeling identifies several known risks associated with deep brain stimulation (dbs), including but not limited to: battery leakage or failure, lead or lead extension breakage, hardware malfunctions, loose connections, electrical shorts or open circuits, and lead insulation breaches.These issues may or may not require device removal or replacement.Labeling additionally notes potential patient-related effects such as weakness, muscle spasms, tremors, restlessness, movement disorders, loss of adequate stimulation, and undesirable sensations (e.G., tingling).Based on all available information, engineering analysis of the returned product did not confirm the reported high impedance.As a result, the most probable cause was attributed to a known inherent risk associated with the device.Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: dbs-ipg-r-mri upn: m365db12160 model: db-1216 serial: (b)(6) batch: 5002863 udi: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the deep brain stimulation (dbs) patient experienced body fatigue, pain, inadequate therapy on their left torso and felt the implantable pulse generator (ipg) rotate in pocket site.Functional testing revealed a high impedance contact that was reprogrammed around resulting with adequate therapy and patient symptoms residing.The physician assessed that the patients symptoms were exacerbated while the dbs therapy was on however resided once reprogrammed.The patient underwent a procedure wherein the ipg was repositioned and secured in the pocket site and additional functional testing confirmed high impedance on the lead extension as a result was replaced with another of the same model before completing the procedure.The patient did well post-operatively.Additional information provided the model and serial number of the implantable pulse generator (ipg).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERCISE
Common Device Name
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
road 698, lot no. 12
dorado PR 00646 -260
*   00646-2602
Manufacturer Contact
erik sherburne
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
7632920920
MDR Report Key22214311
Report Number3006630150-2025-04459
Device Sequence Number8619915
Product Code NHL
UDI-Device Identifier08714729966371
UDI-Public(01)08714729966371(17)260116(10)5002863
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
PMA/510(K) Number
P150031
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/13/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/16/2026
Device Model NumberDB-3128-55
Device Catalogue NumberDB-3128-55
Device Lot Number5002863
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/19/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/24/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/16/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/15/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-