MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

Model Number	DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code	Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event	Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the customer that a defective preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was identified.The tip of the lens was found to be warped.The procedure was completed with another lens.No other information is available.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3, a3b, a4 and a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section b3: date of event: unknown, not provided, section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section h3 - the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: june 18, 2025.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection revealed that the lens was stuck in the cartridge and overridden by the plunger rod.The tip of the cartridge was also observed to be damaged.Ovd was observed inside the cartridge.The lens module was opened and inspected; no issues were identified.The plunger rod and handpiece were inspected revealing no issues.The lens was removed from the cartridge and inspected revealing that the lens was folded.The lens was also observed to be damaged and torn.The lens could not be unfolded for further evaluation.The complaint issue lens damaged was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Therefore, no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.

• Brand Name: TECNIS SIMPLICITY
• Common Device Name: INTRAOCULAR LENS
• Manufacturer (Section D): AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.; road 402 north, anasco ind. pk; anasco PR 00610
• Manufacturer Contact: somyata nagpal ; 31 technology drive; irvine, CA 92618 ; 7142478552
• MDR Report Key: 22285555
• Report Number: 3012236936-2025-000170
• Device Sequence Number: 8892867
• Product Code: HQL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 05050474731929
• UDI-Public: (01)05050474731929(17)270826
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: DE
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: P980040
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): Unknown
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: User Facility,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 07/24/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: DIB00
• Device Catalogue Number: DIB00U0280
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Was the Report Sent to FDA?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 05/22/2025
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 07/03/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 06/18/2025
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 07/24/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Yes
• Date Device Manufactured: 08/26/2024
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Sex: Unknown