|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. Hard Base Implantable Port, Hickman Single-Lumen, 9.6F; Port & Catheter, Implanted, Subcutaneous, Intravascular
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
0604550 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Unspecified Infection (1930); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
| Date of Event |
06/05/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported infection as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient was allegedly developed with unspecified infection.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.B5, d1, d4 (medical device catalog #, unique identifier (udi) #), g3, h6 (patient, method, result, conclusion) section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that, on (b)(6) 2005, a patient was implanted with port via the left subclavian vein for chemotherapy treatment for recurrent cervical cancer.Sometime after the port placement, it was reported that the patient was diagnosed with an unspecified infection and thrombosis.Subsequently, the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that, on (b)(6) 2005, a patient was implanted with port via the left subclavian vein for chemotherapy treatment for recurrent cervical cancer.Sometime after the port placement, it was reported that the patient was diagnosed with an unspecified infection and thrombosis.Subsequently, the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this lot.Investigation summary: although the physical device was not returned for evaluation, medical records were provided for review.Medical record states that, the patient underwent an implantable port placement procedure via left subclavian vein using a bardport due to the need for vascular access as part of chemotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer treatment.Catheter tip was positioned at the junction between the superior vena cava and the right atrium, it was confirmed by fluoroscopic guidance.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported infection and thrombosis as no evidence was found in the provided report.A review of sterilization records, endotoxin testing results, and bioburden data was conducted in accordance with applicable quality system and regulatory requirements, and no nonconformances or anomalies were identified.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B1, d4 (medical device lot #, unique identifier (udi) #), g3, h6 (device, method, result, conclusion).Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|