|
Philips received a report that the patient sustained an approximate 21 cm burn (third degree) to her left hip area during a lumbar exam in the headfirst supine position.The burn is described as irregular circular shaped open area wound with areas that appear to be burned through several layers of skin.The patient has a history of diabetes, obesity, hypertension and is on anticoagulant therapy.The patient is reported to be undergoing treatment of the burn.
|
|
A female patient was positioned head first supine, for lumbar examination with the ds posterior coil.Shortly after the examination, the patient sustained an approximate 21 cm burn to her left hip area.The patient experienced a heating sensation during the scan, but she did not press the nurse call.A digital photo of the reported injury was provided for review and matches the reported description.The burn is described as irregular circular shaped open area wound with areas that appear to be burned through several layers of skin.Additionally, information was received that the patient was operated due to complication after the heating incident.The treatment was performed at another hospital and there is no additional information available.After our investigation and analysis, it was concluded that the mr system and coil used in this case were working correctly.There is no indication of a malfunction of the mr system or coil used that could have contributed to the incident.The patient heating incident, (3rd degree) burn 21cm long to the left hip area, is consistent with heating incidents most likely caused by insufficient distance between body parts and bore, referred to as skin-bore rf-burn.The location of the harm in relation to the body coil (close to the ring section) and the shape appearance of the burn (no signs of skin-skin contact or imprint of conducting foreign materials e.G.Metal) are aligned with the most likely cause, skin-to-bore contact.No padding was used to prevent the contact between the skin and the bore wall and the distance to the bore was 0 cm during full scanning, based on the information form patient heating questionnaire.The observed rf burn can be explained by close contact with the bore wall (obese patients touching or in close proximity to body coil), in combination with first level controlled mode.Contributing factors to this incident are as follows: the patient's condition, obese, hypertensive, suffering from diabetes and using anticoagulant therapy, is considered to be a contributing factor.The thermoregulation of those patients is known to be impaired.The risk of rf energy-related injuries is higher in patients with impaired thermoregulation.Two scans with high sar values (>2 w/kg, at 2.336 w/kg) were executed.High sar scans are a bigger challenge for the cool down mechanism than low sar scans.The total administered specific energy dose of 2.86 kj/kg exceeded the recommended limit of 2.0 kj/kg for patients with impaired thermoregulation.The patient ventilation was not at the highest level.Level 5 is recommended for high sar scans; it supports the cool down mechanism.
|