| Model Number |
GAB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) slipped into the back of the eye during implantation.Pars plana vitrectomy (ppv) was performed for retrieval of the iol.No further details were provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a2, a3, a4 and a5: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6a - implant date: not applicable, lens was not implanted.Section d6b - explant date: not applicable, lens was not implanted.Section h6 -health effect - clinical code: 4581: no code available (device dislocation).Section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3 - the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 28-jul-2025 section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product.The lens was found stuck in the mouth of the cartridge; the lead haptic was unfolded as the lens was not advanced far enough into the cartridge for the folding process to begin.Viscoelastic residue was not observed to be evenly distributed throughout the cartridge; no cartridge tip or cartridge issues were observed.The lens module was inspected revealing no issues; viscoelastic residue was observed on the lens module lid.The lens was removed from the cartridge and cleaned, revealing no issues.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issues reported were not identified.The other observed issues could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.The reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data: the product investigation has been reopened to address discrepancies between sections (device evaluation and the investigation report summary) device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product.The lens was found stuck in the mouth of the cartridge.Based on the complaint description, it is indicated that the lens was placed in the cartridge after removal to be returned for evaluation.Viscoelastic residue was not observed to be evenly distributed throughout the cartridge; no cartridge tip or cartridge issues were observed.The lens module was inspected revealing no issues; viscoelastic residue was observed on the lens module lid.The lens was removed from the cartridge and cleaned, revealing no issues.The complaint issues reported were not identified during product evaluation.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.The reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|