• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 APHERESIS PORT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 APHERESIS PORT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number A710962
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Unspecified Infection (1930)
Date of Event 06/13/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported infection as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient developed with unspecified infection.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through litigation process that on (b)(6), 2020, the patient underwent a lateral right internal jugular vein chest port-a-cath placement procedure using a powerport for long term central venous access for intermittent apheresis as part of myasthenia gravis treatment.After some time later, the patient developed with unspecified infection.Subsequently, the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: although the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Medical record alleges that, the patient underwent an implantable port placement procedure using a powerport for long term central venous access for intermittent apheresis as part of myasthenia gravis treatment, the patient had two bard powerflow implantable apheresis iv port implanted laterally and medially.Approximately one year, eight months and six days later, the patient was performed with blood culture.It was reported with staphylococcus capitis (a).Approximately eight days later, the patient with indication of bacteremia was planned for lateral right internal jugular vein chest port a cath removal.The catheter leading to the jugular vein was completely removed.The port pocket demonstrated no signs of infection.Next day, the patient with indication of infection from unknown source underwent a medial right chest port removal.The port and catheter were removed in their entirety.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported infection.However, the relationship to the port is unknown.A review of sterilization records, endotoxin testing results, and bioburden data was conducted in accordance with applicable quality system and regulatory requirements, and no nonconformances or anomalies were identified.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B5, d4 (medical device lot #, unique identifier (udi) #), g3, h6 (method, result) section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APHERESIS PORT
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
michael gaffney
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key22305122
Report Number3006260740-2025-04141
Device Sequence Number15452974
Product Code PTD
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K163001
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/10/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2021
Device Catalogue NumberA710962
Device Lot NumberREEN3569
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/13/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/01/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/23/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/07/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/28/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-