| Catalog Number |
PLPRO4020 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/02/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not expected to be returned for evaluation and review.However, the complaint investigation is not complete at this time.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The sales representative reported on behalf of the customer that the plpro4020, pro surgical smoke evacuation pencil,7/8" (22mm),10ft.(3m) was being used on 2un25 and ¿we wanted to notify you that we had another burn today, however we are not 100% sure of the cause.The surgeon had a burn to their paper gown.If i had to guess, i would think inadvertent touching of the gown to the cautery pencil immediately after activation ceased.¿.There was no impact or injury for the patient or user.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The sales representative reported on behalf of the customer that the plpro4020, pro surgical smoke evacuation pencil,7/8" (22mm),10ft.(3m) was being used on (b)(6) 2025 and ¿we wanted to notify you that we had another burn today, however we are not 100% sure of the cause.The surgeon had a burn to their paper gown.If i had to guess, i would think inadvertent touching of the gown to the cautery pencil immediately after activation ceased.¿.There was no impact or injury for the patient or user.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Neither the device nor photographic evidence was provided.Therefore, the reported event can not be verified.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.This is the only complaint for this lot number and failure mode within the past two years.(b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: the electrode tip may remain hot enough to cause burns after the current has been de-activated.Inadvertent activation or movement of the activated electrode outside of the field of vision may result in injury to the patient.Localized burns to the patient or physician may result from electrical currents carried through conductive objects.Current may be generated in conductive objects by direct contact with the active electrode, or by the active accessory being in close proximity to the conductive object.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The sales representative reported on behalf of the customer that the plpro4020, pro surgical smoke evacuation pencil,7/8" (22mm),10ft.(3m) was being used on (b)(6) 2025 and ¿we wanted to notify you that we had another burn today, however we are not 100% sure of the cause.The surgeon had a burn to their paper gown.If i had to guess, i would think inadvertent touching of the gown to the cautery pencil immediately after activation ceased.¿.There was no impact or injury for the patient or user.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Update: the device will not be returned for evaluation, but photographic evidence has been provided.Reported event ¿the surgeon had a burn to their paper gown¿ was confirmed.Root cause cannot be determined, however, based upon photos and the ifu, etc.; a possible cause of this event could be inadvertent activation.Neither the device nor photographic evidence was provided.Therefore, the reported event can not be verified.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.This is the only complaint for this lot number and failure mode within the past two years.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 30 reports, regarding 44 devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: the electrode tip may remain hot enough to cause burns after the current has been de-activated.Inadvertent activation or movement of the activated electrode outside of the field of vision may result in injury to the patient.Localized burns to the patient or physician may result from electrical currents carried through conductive objects.Current may be generated in conductive objects by direct contact with the active electrode, or by the active accessory being in close proximity to the conductive object.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|