| Catalog Number |
XIITP6513 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932)
|
| Date of Event |
03/15/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the implants at tooth sites #47 and #37 were removed due to allergic reaction and infection.Symptoms as a result of the event: pain, inflammation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).Customer has indicated that the product is in process of being returned to zimvie for investigation.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 4109, 4111 and 3331.H6: investigation findings code was added: 213.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4310 and 4315.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie did not receive the reported implant for evaluation.Visual inspection could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available information using the item number, device history record (dhr) review, and risk management file (rmf).Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was patient factors and inadequate treatment planning.A summary investigation has been completed for infection events identifying that a definitive root cause cannot be identified due to the wide range of external (non-design/ non-manufacturing related) factors potentially impacting the sterility of the implant and its environment.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction could not be verified.Without device receipt, the reported event is non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional event information received at the time of this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional event information received at the time of this report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 67.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported implant for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed.The returned implant has signs of use.The implant was identified as reported however, no apparent malfunction was identified with the implant that would contribute to the reported events.Implant matched prints where measured.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was patient factors and inadequate treatment planning.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction has not occurred.No apparent malfunction was identified with the implant that would contribute to the reported events.The reported event is non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|