• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 7; QEW

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 7; QEW Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LITNGBT7TQ130
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/31/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) using an indigo system aspiration catheter 7 (cat7), a non-penumbra sheath and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician completed three passes using the cat7.It was reported that the physician noted resistance while advancing the sheath prior to advancing the cat7.While torquing the cat7 through the sheath, the physician experienced resistance and decided to remove the cat7.While removing the cat7, the physician encountered resistance and noticed that the cat7 was fractured at the mid-shaft.The guidewire was advanced and the fractured cat7 was removed over the wire with the sheath.The procedure was completed using a new cat7 and a new sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned indigo system aspiration catheter 7 (cat7) confirmed that the catheter was fractured, and the distal fractured segment was stuck inside the sheath.Evaluation revealed stretching at the fractured location, indicating that the device was stretched prior to fracturing.If the cat7 is retracted against resistance, damage such as stretching and subsequent fracture may occur.Further evaluation of the non-penumbra sheath revealed kinks.The root cause of this damage could not be determined; however, this damage may have contributed to the resistance encountered during retraction of the cat7.Further evaluation revealed additional kinks on the cat7.Based on the location of the kinks, this damage is incidental to the complaint and likely occurred during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM ASPIRATION CATHETER 7
Common Device Name
QEW
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key22311670
Report Number3005168196-2025-00212
Device Sequence Number15667953
Product Code QEW
UDI-Device Identifier00815948025462
UDI-Public00815948025462
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K223186
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/23/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLITNGBT7TQ130
Device Lot NumberH00005496
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/10/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/31/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/23/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/18/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age60 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-