| Catalog Number |
VIUS10060 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Component Misassembled (4004)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/29/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent a stent placement procedure using the lifestar vascular stent.During the procedure, it came to notice that the radiopaque marker was not in the correct location on the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.D2b (nio; fge) section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, no specific lot was provided, therefore, no dhr-review could be performed.Investigation summary: the stent delivery system was not returned for evaluation and photos were not provided which leads to inconclusive results.There was no indication for a manufacturing deficiency.In this case, only very limited information was provided and a clear description of the whole event is not provided.Based on the available limited information and as the sample was not available for evaluation, the investigation is closed with inconclusive results for component misassembly.A definite root cause of the reported incident can not be identified.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risks.About device description, the ifu states "a single radiopaque marker on the outer catheter (d) of the delivery system is attached approximately 6 mm proximal to the distal end of the delivery system.Prior to deployment, this radiopaque marker overlaps the distal markers on the stent".Regarding warnings, the ifu states "visually inspect the bard lifestar biliary stent system (or bard lifestar vascular stent system) to verify that the device has not been damaged due to shipping or improper storage.Do not use damaged equipment".The ifu further states that "there are four radiopaque tantalum markers on each end of the stent and an additional radiopaque marker band on the outer catheter of the delivery system.In its compressed stage, the tantalum markers appear like a contiguous band at each end of the stent" d2b (nio; fge), e1, e3, g2, g3, h6 (device, method).Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent a stent placement procedure using the lifestar vascular stent.During the procedure, it came to notice that the radiopaque marker was not in the correct location on the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent a stent placement procedure using the lifestar vascular stent.During the procedure, it came to notice that the radiopaque marker was not in the correct location on the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, no specific lot was provided, therefore, no dhr-review could be performed.Investigation summary: the stent delivery system was not returned for evaluation and photos were not provided which leads to inconclusive results.There was no indication for a manufacturing deficiency.In this case, only very limited information was provided, and a clear description of the whole event is not provided.Based on the available limited information and as the sample was not available for evaluation, the investigation is closed with inconclusive results for component misassembly.A definite root cause of the reported incident cannot be identified.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risks.About device description, the ifu states "a single radiopaque marker on the outer catheter (d) of the delivery system is attached approximately 6 mm proximal to the distal end of the delivery system.Prior to deployment, this radiopaque marker overlaps the distal markers on the stent".Regarding warnings, the ifu states "visually inspect the bard lifestar biliary stent system (or bard lifestar vascular stent system) to verify that the device has not been damaged due to shipping or improper storage.Do not use damaged equipment".The ifu further states that "there are four radiopaque tantalum markers on each end of the stent and an additional radiopaque marker band on the outer catheter of the delivery system.In its compressed stage, the tantalum markers appear like a contiguous band at each end of the stent" d2b (nio; fge), e1, e3, g2, g3, h6 (device, method).Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|