• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPOD8
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/23/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the splenic artery using pod coils, a pod packing coil (packing coil), and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, while advancing a pod coil through the microcatheter, the pod coil unintentionally detached within the microcatheter.Therefore, the microcatheter containing the detached pod coil was removed.The same issue occurred with another pod coil and a packing coil.The physician removed the microcatheter containing the detached pod coil and packing coil respectively.The procedure was completed using a new microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was updated on this follow-up #01 mfr report 3005168196-2025-00214: 1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem.Evaluation of the second returned pod coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly.Evaluation revealed that the pusher assembly was fractured, and the pull wire was retracted from its initial position on the distal end of the pusher assembly.If the pod coil is advanced against resistance damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.Based on the reported complaint, the root cause of resistance could not be determined.The pusher assembly fracture likely contributed to the embolization coil detachment.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is also associated with mfr report number: 1.3005168196-2025-00215.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the splenic artery using a pod coil and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, while advancing a pod coil through the microcatheter, the pod coil unintentionally detached within the microcatheter.Therefore, the microcatheter containing the detached pod coil was removed.It was reported that the physician was unable to implant a pod coil and a pod packing coil (packing coil) and no additional details are available.Therefore, both coils were removed.The procedure was completed using a new microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key22325650
Report Number3005168196-2025-00214
Device Sequence Number8948306
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013831
UDI-Public00814548013831
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAS
PMA/510(K) Number
K141134
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/04/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPOD8
Device Lot NumberF93635
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/26/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/07/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/25/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/04/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/14/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-