|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, KIT, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
0605510 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
| Date of Event |
10/06/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that sometime later port placement procedure, the patient allegedly developed with thrombosis.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported thrombosis as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that, on (b)(6), 2013, a patient underwent port placement via the right subclavian vein for the treatment of aplastic anemia.Approximately one year, six months and twenty one days later, on (b)(6), 2014, the patient was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis.Subsequently, the port was removed on (b)(6), 2014.However, the current status of the patient remains unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this lot.Investigation summary: although the physical device was not returned for evaluation, medical records were provided for review.Medical record alleges that, a titanium low profile port was implanted in a patient via the right subclavian vein for the treatment of aplastic anemia.One year, six months and twenty one days later, the patient presented with acute right upper extremity swelling.Further workup turned out to demonstrate a right upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.Next day, the port and the entire catheter system, including the intact catheter tip were removed without difficulty.The device was then sent for pathological examination.Therefore, it can be confirmed that the patient had right upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported device appeared to trigger rejection issue.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B3, b5, g3, h6 (device, component, method, result)
section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|