|
This report is being submitted as part of remediation activities associated with capa 643143, addressing mdr reporting guidance from the fda¿s 1995 preamble, which ensures complaints related to corrections and recalls previously reported to the fda under 21 cfr 806 are now reported as mdrs; this is not a new malfunction/event.Product analysis: upon receipt of the suspect complaint device at medtronic¿s quality laboratory with the capsule fully closed, visual analysis showed the handle appears intact.The tip-retrieval mechanism appears intact.The carriage components are observed to be undamaged.The device was returned with the end cap/screw gear snap fit connected.From close observation, one of the tabs does appear to have a hairline fracture at the point where the tab protrudes from the deployment knob.The inner member shaft appears intact with no evidence of damage.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The device was received and evaluated by medtronic; visual evaluation indicates that the blue actuator handle appears intact, and the carriage components are also observed to be undamaged.From close observation, one of the tabs does appear to have a hairline fracture at the point where the tab protrudes from the blue deployment knob; this damage confirms the report of actuator separation, which was reportedly snapped back together, and the valve was removed from the dcs.Actuator (deployment knob) separation is typically associated with broken or damaged snap fit tabs, either one tab or both, which hold the handle together.An actuator separation will prevent loading and/or deployment through normal use.In this case, it was reported that the capsule bowed during loading, indicative of a misloaded valve, which may have contributed to the handle separation.There were no load check images provided to assess the quality of the load.Loading of the valve is a process that is highly dependent on the operator technique.The device instructions for use (ifu) contains instructions to use the integrated loading bath which features a mirror to aid in accurate placement of the valve frame paddles during loading.The user is instructed to not advance the capsule over the frame paddles unless they are fully seated in the center of the paddle pockets, and to perform an inspection of the loaded capsule under fluoroscopy.In this situation, the inspection process properly identified the misload prior to introduction to the patient.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Medtronic received information that prior to the implant of this 34 mm transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, as the valve was being loaded onto the delivery catheter system (dcs) by an experienced loader, the blue handle separated into two pieces when approximately 50% of the valve was inside the capsule.At that time, the distal portion of the dcs and the valve capsule appeared to have a banana shape to it.The blue handle easily snapped back into place and the valve was able to be removed from the dcs.There were no imagestaken of this incident.It was reported that there may have been a misload that caused the initial problem.Upon inspection of the dcs, the blue handle appeared to have wobble but continued to move up and down the handle.The dcs was not used for the implant.Another dcs was used to successfully complete the procedure.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|