• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G11672
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/12/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during a pulse field ablation procedure, the hub of a performer introducer¿s dilator separated upon advancement of the device into the femoral vein over an unspecified wire guide.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.Additional information has been requested.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received 01jul2025.The access site was normal.Resistance was not encountered during insertion or removal and as per the physician, "it just broke off".The anatomy was not stenosed, tortuous, or calcified.Reportedly, an unspecified "stiff wire.035" guidewire was used during the procedure.The procedure was completed using another sheath set.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, during a pulse field ablation procedure, the hub of a performer introducer¿s dilator separated upon advancement of the device into the femoral vein over an unspecified wire guide.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.Additional information was received 01jul2025.The access site was normal.Resistance was not encountered during insertion or removal and as per the physician, "it just broke off".The anatomy was not stenosed, tortuous, or calcified.Reportedly, an unspecified "stiff wire.035" guidewire was used during the procedure.The procedure was completed using another sheath set.Corrected information: d4 = udi.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The hub was broken off the dilator.Glue residue was present on the dilator shaft, near the hub separation.No other damage was noted.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformances on the final or sub-assembly lots.A review of complaint history found no additional relevant complaints for this lot number.The customer followed relevant instructions in the ifu (instructions for use).A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A supplier investigation was conducted.The supplier concluded that the dilator tube was not fully inserted into the hub.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured out of specification; however, there is no evidence of additional non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.There are 100% inspections in place to capture this non-conformance, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot-related complaints have been received from the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a supplier manufacturing deficiency contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed, and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERFORMER INTRODUCER
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key22341650
Report Number1820334-2025-00786
Device Sequence Number15743368
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002116726
UDI-Public(01)00827002116726(17)280513(10)16600558
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K171999
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/02/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG11672
Device Catalogue NumberRCFW-18.0P-38-30-RB
Device Lot Number16600558
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/23/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/12/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/01/2025
11/12/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/26/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/08/2025
12/02/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/13/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-