• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 10 & SPRUNG RESERV.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 10 & SPRUNG RESERV.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX574T
Medical Device Problem Codes Obstruction of Flow (2423); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information or the investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (#fx574t) was implanted on an unspecified date.According to the complainant, the shunt system caused a malfuction.The patient underwent a revision procedure on an unspecified date.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.The complained product was not yet sent to the manufacturer for investigation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valve were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operate within the permissible tolerance in their respective relevant positions.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine visible deposits in the progav 2.0 and the shuntassistant 2.0.The deposits had no effect upon the specifications at the time of the examination.The shuntsystem operated within all specifications.Deposits caused by substances naturally present in the patient's body, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of organic material can affect the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from (b)(4) no further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
The complained product was sent to the manufacturer for investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 10 & SPRUNG RESERV.
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key22344980
Report Number3004721439-2025-00179
Device Sequence Number8573729
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906502508
UDI-Public4041906502508
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/17/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX574T
Device Catalogue NumberFX574T
Device Lot Number20076891
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/11/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/11/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/27/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/17/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/02/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age38 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight110 KG
-
-