| Model Number |
FX574T |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
06/10/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The adverse event is filed under aic reference (b)(4).Investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to aesculap inc.That a progav 2.0 sys sa2.0 10 & sprung reserv.(part # fx574t) was implanted on an unspecified date.According to the complainant the patient was not draining and the ventricles were enlarged.Reportedly there were issues programming the valve.The valve might be occluded.The patient underwent a revision procedure on an unspecified date.Additional information has been requested but not yet provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The adverse event is filed under aic reference (b)(4).Investigation results: visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valve were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operate within the permissible tolerance in their respective relevant positions.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine visible deposits in the progav 2.0 and the shuntassistant 2.0.The deposits had no effect upon the specifications at the time of the examination.The shuntsystem operated within all specifications.Deposits caused by substances naturally present in the patient's body, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of organic material can affect the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|