• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Failure to Fold (1255)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the pre-loaded toric intraocular lens (iol) mechanism delivered lens in such a way as there was a indentation defect on the iol optic and was cut out and removed from patients left eye.Back up lens was implanted.There was no patient injury.Surgery was completed in same procedure.Device did not work as intended or device issue during set-up/ prep/ or handling.Bss was used as a lubricant.No delivery issues or manipulation was not required to deploy the device.Additional information received stated that there was a central defect that occurred during delivery of the pre-loaded iol.It looked like the haptic bent a different way, so when the plunger was pressed forward, it could have indented the lens.It¿s hard to say.There is no way to see an defects prior to implantation.Lens or haptic were not stuck in cartridge.No resistance felt during delivery; however, it was folded wrong.Sometimes it¿s impossible to ¿hold on to the product¿ as this lens was cut into pieces to be removed.There were no complications, and the back-up lens went in beautifully.No patient injury and any other intervention was not required.There was no use error.The product was destroyed and will not be shipped back.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6: device code: 1069 - 1069 - break - used to indicate lens damage and haptic damage.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22350264
Report Number3012236936-2025-000174
Device Sequence Number12904923
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746565
UDI-Public(01)05050474746565(17)260602
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/27/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/02/2026
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/03/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/27/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-