|
From staff: surgeon broke a screw during surgery.The plan was to remove the screw to remove the plate and then replace the screw.The screw head broke in the process.This allowed surgeon to remove the plate and keep the shaft of the screw in place as surgeon had intended.Surgeon believed that removing the screw would have created more harm than leaving it in place.Surgeon notified the patient and the family and dictated this in his progress note.From operative report: i was planning on replacing the two screws that captured the butterfly fragment.I removed the plate.Of the two interfragmentary screws, one of the screw heads broke off.It was still proving good capture of the interfragmentary segment, and i elected to leave it in place because i think the harm of removing it outweighed the harm of leaving it in.The second interfragmentary screws was removed while removing the plate and then placed back in the same position to hold the posterior butterfly fragment.What was the original intended procedure? : 1.Removal of external fixator under anesthesia.2.Intramedullary nail fixation left tibia.3.Intramedullary nail fixation left tibial shaft fracture.4.Open reduction internal fixation left trimalleolar ankle fracture.5.Open reduction internal fixation left syndesmotic injury.6.Application wound vac greater than 50 sq cm.7.Irrigation debridement open tibia fracture.What problem did the user have: device failed (e.G.Broke, couldn't get it to work or stopped working); device malfunction - that is, the device did not do what it was supposed to do.Therapies being used on the patient at the time of the event that may have caused or contributed to the event: not known.
|