• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK? PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTALINK? PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310040
Medical Device Problem Codes Entrapment of Device (1212); Mechanical Jam (2983); Output Problem (3005)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/05/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve additional details regarding the reported event, but further information was unable to be obtained.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the burr became stuck in the lesion.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery (lad).A 1.75mm rotablator rotalink plus was selected for use.During the procedure, it was noted that the 1.5 burr got stuck in the lesion.The speed was at 180,000 rpm but the actual speed was only at 120,000 rpm.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There was no patient injury and the patient was stable after the procedure.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the burr became stuck in the lesion.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery (lad).A 1.75mm rotablator rotalink plus was selected for use.During the procedure, it was noted that the 1.5 burr got stuck in the lesion.The speed was at 180,000 rpm but the actual speed was only at 120,000 rpm.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There was no patient injury and the patient was stable after the procedure.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the burr became stuck in the lesion.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery (lad).A 1.75mm rotablator rotalink plus was selected for use.During the procedure, it was noted that the 1.5 burr got stuck in the lesion.The speed was at 180,000 rpm but the actual speed was only at 120,000 rpm.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There was no patient injury and the patient was stable after the procedure.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H6: device codes: corrected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK? PLUS
Common Device Name
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
model farm road
cork T12 Y K88
EI   T12 YK88
Manufacturer Contact
mark mischke
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
7634941632
MDR Report Key22365857
Report Number2124215-2025-41079
Device Sequence Number20905096
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIN
PMA/510(K) Number
P900056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/18/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/07/2025
Device Model NumberH749236310040
Device Catalogue NumberH749236310040
Device Lot Number0031570981
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/25/2025
08/19/2025
04/28/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/14/2025
09/08/2025
05/18/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/08/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-