• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTAPRO; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTAPRO; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 3256
Medical Device Problem Codes Unstable (1667); Defective Device (2588); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Output Problem (3005)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/05/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the speed surpassed the set rotational speed.A rotapro console kit was selected for use.During the procedure, the speed was set to 150,000 rpm, however the maximum observed rotational speed reached up to 164,000 rpm in normal mode and dynaglide mode.Tried to dynaglide the speed but would not lower to 60,000 rpm even with different burr sizes.The catheter was removed from the body and the power was turned on and off on the console.Rota was platformed outside the body and catheter reinserted.No patient complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.Console failed the final functional test.The pneumatic kit from the gold unit was swapped into the console and subsequently tested, that pairing failed the final functional test.The consoles original pneumatic kit was then paired with the front panel from the gold unit.That pairing failed the final functional test.To ensure the gold unit components were functioning properly, the gold units front panel and pneumatic kit were paired in the console.That pairing passed the final functional test without failing at any step.Console failed the visual inspection because the front panel is scratched.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the speed surpassed the set rotational speed.A rotapro console kit was selected for use.During the procedure, the speed was set to 150,000 rpm, however the maximum observed rotational speed reached up to 164,000 rpm in normal mode and dynaglide mode.Tried to dynaglide the speed but would not lower to 60,000 rpm even with different burr sizes.The catheter was removed from the body and the power was turned on and off on the console.Rota was platformed outside the body and catheter reinserted.No patient complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTAPRO
Common Device Name
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112 5798
Manufacturer Contact
mark mischke
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
7634941632
MDR Report Key22366905
Report Number2124215-2025-42010
Device Sequence Number15510586
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729975076
UDI-Public(01)08714729975076(11)220104(10)RP005173
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMS
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P900056/S166
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/18/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number3256
Device Catalogue Number3256
Device Lot NumberRP005173
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/18/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/05/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/24/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/18/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/04/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-