|
As reported: "primary surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025.Two months after surgery, an x-ray revealed that the 2 locking screws inserted on the outside plate had backed out of the plate and the lock had come loose.The screws inserted into the first and third holes from the outer side of the plate backed out.It is unclear which of the screws actually backed out.The patient is originally a farmer and, according to reports, resumed work three weeks after surgery without following the doctor's instructions.Revision surgery is scheduled on (b)(6) 2025".
|
|
Please note correction to g1 (reporting contact).The reported event could be confirmed, since based on the provided x-rays and the device return.The device inspection revealed the following: the screw head is strongly damaged and discolored.These damages were most likely caused by excessive force applied during the locking of the screw.The threads at the head level are heavily worn out and blunt, as they are not sharp anymore.The threads at the shaft level also appear to worn out, implying contact between the shaft and the plate occurred.These evidences indicate this locking screw l14 (lot ak4130) is one of both screws that backed out.All 4 locking screws were inserted into the locking holes of the plates.Each screw was tested for each hole.Despite the observed damages of the plate holes and screws, they could be locked as intended.This event was forwarded to medical affairs, with the following assessment: « clearly the patients postoperative activity might have played a role here.Being a farmer is a heavy duty job, it is conceivable that the arm and shoulder were loaded to much during the healing phase which caused movement in the fracture, implant and screws, loosening them from the plate.There are other factors to consider as well, the screws on the lateral side seem relatively short, and the other factor is that we don¿t know whether the screws were locked properly at all.Based on the provided information, the root cause of the reported event is muti-factorial: the location of the fracture and the technical aspects of the surgical procedure may have contributed to the event.Furthermore, patient activity levels post-op, co-morbidities may also have contributed to an inadequate load distribution, and therefore the breakage of the implant.» a review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Based on the investigation, the root cause was attributed to a combination of user and patient condition related issue.The implant breakage occurred as a direct result of the patient post-op activity.The choice of the construct and technical aspects of the procedure may also have contributed to the failure of the implant, as the device inspection showed evidence of inadequate insertion and locking of the screws.If more information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
|
|
As reported: "primary surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025.Two months after surgery, an x-ray revealed that the 2 locking screws inserted on the outside plate had backed out of the plate and the lock had come loose.The screws inserted into the first and third holes from the outer side of the plate backed out.It is unclear which of the screws actually backed out.The patient is originally a farmer and, according to reports, resumed work three weeks after surgery without following the doctor's instructions.Revision surgery is scheduled on (b)(6) 2025".
|