|
It was reported that the trigger would not release on the lf4418.There was no patient injury or medical intervention and extended procedure time reported was five minutes.There was no patient injury, medical intervention, or extended procedure time reported.These are commonly used devices that are readily available.
|
|
It was reported that the trigger would not release on the lf4418.There was no patient injury or medical intervention and extended procedure time reported was five minutes.There was no patient injury, medical intervention, or extended procedure time reported.These are commonly used devices that are readily available.
|
|
Please note update to section e2, health professional and e3, health professional occupation and h p occupation - other.The investigation results confirm this incident no longer falls within mdr reportability requirements as it was determined it was not functional output "uol-06: loose / damaged components".The device was returned to stryker sustainability solutions for evaluation.Upon inspection of the received complaint device, the handle, blade trigger, button, shaft, and jaws appeared to be intact.The device plug is stryker branded, the plug was inspected for damage, corrosion, and deformation and none were found.The spacer pads were inspected for damage and found none.Thumb button feedback was acceptable as it was able to depress the pressure pad on the membrane switch and exhibited a tactile click; and the pressure pad disengaged when released.The handle functionality was tested and confirmed to be acceptable as the lever was able to actuate the jaws multiple times.The handle lever was returned to the start position and the jaws open when released.An audible click was heard when the jaw lever engaged the click tab.While the jaws were in the locked position, they were inspected and found to be properly aligned.The blade trigger was tested and the trigger would not disengage on its own without pushing it back.The bio-burden was cleaned off from the jaws to further inspect and to do the functional inspection.The jaws were cleaned of with enzymatic cleaner to loosen up the built up eschar stuck in the blade tracks.A pick was used to clean and dislodge the blade track.Shards of eschar were pulled out of the track.After the blade track was cleaned the blade trigger work as intended.The trigger was pressed and released and it returned to the start position.A review of the dhr for the reported lot/serial number supports that the device met all inspection and test criteria prior to release from stryker.The reported event could be attributed to: - device not cleaned while in use per ifu guidance.- inadequate cleaning of device, higher than expected level of native soil.- tissue build-up, eschar prevents the jaws from functioning properly the instructions for use (ifu) state: - do not overfill the jaws of the instrument with tissue.This may damage the cutting mechanism or cause the blade to deploy outside of its guiding features, possibly resulting in difficultly opening the jaws or unintended injury to the user or patient.- open the jaws by squeezing the handle until it unlocks, then push the handle completely forward.- the nano-coating featured on the original device is not present on this product.- keep the instrument jaws clean.Build-up of eschar may reduce sealing and/or cutting effectiveness.Wipe jaw surfaces and edges with a sterile, wet gauze pad as needed.- remove any embedded tissue from blade track and jaw hinge area.- do not clean the instrument jaws with a scratch pad or other abrasives.- notice ¿ do not engage the cutting mechanism over sutures, clips, staples, or other metal objects as damage to the cutter may occur.The reported event will continue to be monitored through post-market surveillance.
|