• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON GRIESHABER AG GRIESHABER REVOLUTION DSP FORCEPS; FORCEPS, OPHTHALMIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON GRIESHABER AG GRIESHABER REVOLUTION DSP FORCEPS; FORCEPS, OPHTHALMIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 705.44
Medical Device Problem Code Activation Problem (4042)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 06/11/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
A healthcare professional reported that an ophthalmic forceps tip was not working.Procedure details and patient impact were not reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected information is provided in d.4 and additional information is provided in h.4 and h.11 the manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information is provided in sections h.6 and h.11.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.A non-conformance based review of the lot number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.The product was not received at the manufacturing site.Therefore, the root cause for the customer's complaint could not be determined.As the root cause and its origin are inconclusive, further investigative or manufacturing actions are not warranted at this time.Receipt of additional relevant information or supporting materials will prompt a re-evaluation of the complaint investigation.Complaint data for all manufacturer products is reviewed monthly to monitor for adverse trends.During the last review, no adverse trends were observed for the reported product and event combination.The complaint data will continue to be monitored for evidence of adverse trending and further action will be taken, as appropriate.No further action warranted at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information is provided in sections d.4, d.9, h.3, h.6 and h.11.The returned instrument was received at the investigation site in its outer blister covered with the tyvek foil, showing the lot information.The inner blister which protects the device during shipment, was not used.The instrument was provided in a closed state and shows macroscopic signs of damage, namely that the grasping arms are bent.There are signs of surgery residues.The returned instrument was visually inspected with the aid of a photomicroscope using various magnifications and was functionally tested.It was found that the forceps could not be actuated, remain in a close state.The fact that the instrument stuck in a closed state indicates that the bonding between tube and sleeve got broken.However, the point in time when the noticed malfunction occurred can no longer be determined conclusively, nor can the strain put on the device be reconstructed.The customer¿s complaint is confirmed, but a root cause for the reported issue cannot be determined.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot numbers, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.Non-conformance report provided by originator.A non-conformance based review of the lot number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.It cannot be determined how or where the damage to the sample occurred.Therefore, the root cause for the customer's reported event could not be determined.As the root cause and its origin are inconclusive, further investigative or manufacturing actions are not warranted at this time.Receipt of additional relevant information or supporting materials will prompt a re-evaluation of the complaint investigation.Complaint data for all manufacturer products is reviewed monthly to monitor adverse trends.During the last review, no adverse trends were observed for the reported product and event combination.The complaint data will continue to be monitored for evidence of adverse trending and further action will be taken, as appropriate.No further action warranted at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GRIESHABER REVOLUTION DSP FORCEPS
Common Device Name
FORCEPS, OPHTHALMIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON GRIESHABER AG
winkelriedstrasse 52
schaffhausen 8203
SZ  8203
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON GRIESHABER AG
winkelriedstrasse 52
schaffhausen 8203
SZ   8203
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key22384463
Report Number3003398873-2025-00315
Device Sequence Number8761705
Product Code HNR
UDI-Device Identifier07612717064263
UDI-Public(01)07612717064263(17)270131(11)240207(10)16J4UD
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/20/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number705.44
Device Lot Number16J4UD
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/17/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/08/2025
09/16/2025
02/26/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/02/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/30/2025
10/08/2025
03/20/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/07/2024
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-