• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX TI 5.0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX TI 5.0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72200755
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Itching Sensation (1943); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Date of Event 03/09/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after a rotator cuff repair performed in march 9th of 2023, in which a 5.0 titanium twinfix suture anchor was implanted, from the second half of 2023 the patient had red itchy skin sores/pimples with an open head on it's chest, waistline area, back, buttocks, arms and legs caused by an allergic reaction.The adverse event was treated with clobetasol cream and one steroid shot.No further complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: h2: updated information in h6 (health effect - clinical code).H3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined due to the limited clinical information provided.Insufficient product identification information was provided and thus a manufacturing record review could not be conducted.Based on the information available, there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review stated that based on the information provided a direct link between the implant and the patient¿s symptoms cannot be confirmed, nor can be rule out the patient suspected nickel allergy as a contributing factor to the reported event.Due to the limited information provided a thorough medical assessment could not be performed; therefore, we are unable to conclude specific factors known to contribute to the alleged report.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.If any additional information related to this event is received in the future, this investigation will be reopened for further assessment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TWINFIX TI 5.0 ULTRABRAID
Common Device Name
STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
1450 brooks rd.
memphis, TN 38116
5123913905
MDR Report Key22391537
Report Number1219602-2025-01657
Device Sequence Number9017430
Product Code JDR
UDI-Device Identifier03596010577986
UDI-Public3596010577986
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateKS
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K152566
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/06/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72200755
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/11/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/05/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/02/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/06/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight57 KG
-
-