• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SIMPLICITY; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SIMPLICITY; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRN00V
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Halo (2227)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4, a5 and a6: unknown, information was requested but not provided.Section b3: date of event: unknown, not provided, but the best estimate date is between (b)(6) 2025.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, the definite information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a multifocal intraocular lens (iol) implanted in the left eye was explanted in a secondary surgical procedure due to patient experiencing severe halos despite having excellent vision.The patient was unable to tolerate seeing halos.Therefore, another lens of a different model (dib00) was implanted.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: aug 5, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on and found the lens was cut in half with a piece of the lens missing.Damage was observed on the edge of the lens.No further evaluation was performed.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.The issues observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22400883
Report Number3012236936-2025-000184
Device Sequence Number8294149
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474810792
UDI-Public(01)05050474810792(17)270416
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMD
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/22/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRN00V
Device Catalogue NumberDRN00V0215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/11/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/12/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/03/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/22/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/16/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-