|
SALTER LABS SALTER LABS; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, PREFORMED NASAL, HIGH VOLUME LOW PRESSURE, CUFFED (PFNC), PAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
I-PFNC-65 (SALTER H-PFNC-65) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
|
| Date of Event |
06/04/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the report has not been returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record is not possible as no lot number was provided.The documented udi is based on the stock/product code provided by the reporter; the udi-pi is not available as no lot number was provided.All information reasonably known as of 03 jul 2025 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and identified as (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife.Product is defective or caused or contributed to a serious injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Sunmed holdings llc.Received a single report that referenced three different incidences, which were associated with separate units, involving three different patients.This is the first of three reports.Refer to 3004748541-2025-00024 for the second report refer to 3004748541-2025-00025 for the third report.It was reported, a nosebleed occurred immediately after the start of use.There was no report of medical intervention.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Sunmed holdings llc.Received a single report that referenced three different incidences, which were associated with separate units, involving three different patients.This is the first of three reports.Refer to 3004748541-2025-00023 for the first report.Refer to 3004748541-2025-00024 for the second report.Refer to 3004748541-2025-00025 for the third report.It was reported, a nosebleed occurred immediately after the start of use.There was no report of medical intervention.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the report has not been returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record is not possible as no lot number was provided.The documented udi is based on the stock/product code provided by the reporter; the udi-pi is not available as no lot number was provided all information reasonably known as of 03 jul 2025 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife airlife.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and identified as complaint-(b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that an airlife.Product is defective or caused or contributed to a serious injury.The complaint reported an issue of "nosebleeds occurring in a series of cases immediately after the start of use." the investigation determined that no patients were harmed.No product was returned for evaluation, no photo images, and the lot number was not provided; therefore, well lead was unable to review retained samples or the device history record (dhr).On june 20, 2025, well lead conducted hardness testing on related samples, and the results met internal requirements.While some users reported a rigid feeling compared to other endotracheal tubes (etts), the material was confirmed to meet specifications with no changes identified.Based on the investigation, well lead was unable to determine the root cause for this complaint.A risk assessment was performed, and the ultimate risk was determined to be low which does not require reporting to the capa review board.This is the first complaint reported for part number i-pfnc-65, " damaged component(s)" failure mode.There were five other complaints reported for part number i-pfnc-65 during the same timeframe.We will continue to monitor trends during our periodic complaint review meetings.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|