|
On 13 june 2025, bonebridge was informed by dr.(b)(6), of a plate breakage in a patient treated with the cascella lateral clavicle plate.The initial surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025.The implant broke approximately three weeks postoperatively without any reported external trauma.Revision surgery was successfully completed on (b)(6) 2025 without complications.The fracture was a comminuted lateral clavicle fracture with multiple fragments and partial bone loss.To achieve stabilization, the surgeon applied the cascella plate in a bridging configuration [?] spanning an area of the clavicle that lacked direct bony support.Additionally, the fracture zone was stabilized intraoperatively with a vicryl cerclage to maintain fragment alignment.While this measure can help with early fragment positioning, it does not provide significant mechanical offloading of the implant.As a result, the plate bore most of the load during the early healing phase.Bonebridge re-assessed all relevant clinical and technical factors: the implant was manufactured according to validated processes, passed all inspections, and met all specifications.Design validation testing confirmed fatigue resistance up to 263 n for 900,000 cycles, exceeding the predicate device synthes lcp superior clavicle plate 3.5 mm, which withstood 250 n under identical test conditions.A post-market clinical follow-up (pmcf) study was conducted in europe (in accordance with european regulatory requirements).The study included 194 patients and showed no similar cases of plate breakage and a bone healing rate of (b)(4).Additionally, scientific literature supports that while plate breakage in clavicle fixation is rare, it is more likely in bridging constructs[?]especially in cases with limited bony contact.Furthermore, breakage rates reported in the literature for comparable implants range from 2.7% to 7.5%.In contrast, the cascella lateral plate has shown a complication rate of (b)(4) in current surveillance.In conclusion, based on the case-specific information provided to bonebridge and the investigation performed, the implant breakage is attributed to a mechanically demanding clinical environment, including: a long unsupported plate span due to the comminuted fracture, local stress concentration from nearby k-wire drill holes, fatigue stress from normal postoperative shoulder movement.Limited mechanical reinforcement from the vicryl cerclage, which does not significantly offload the plate.The failure occurred within the expected mechanical limitations of the implant under high loading conditions.There is therefore no indication of a systemic issue with the device.The device met all specifications.
|