• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON GRIESHABER AG GRIESHABER MAXGRIP REVOLUTION DSP FORCEPS; FORCEPS, OPHTHALMIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON GRIESHABER AG GRIESHABER MAXGRIP REVOLUTION DSP FORCEPS; FORCEPS, OPHTHALMIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 711.13
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/05/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
A nurse reported that during the vitreoretinal surgery, ophthalmic forceps arm jaw broke off and fell posteriorly in the patients eye.The surgeon was able to retrieve the broken piece from the back of the eye with no harm.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information is provided in sections d.9, h.3, h.6 and h.11.The returned instrument was received in its inner and outer blister, covered with the tyvek lid foil showing the lot information.However, the inner blister was not correctly positioned in the outer blister.The product evidently shows macroscopic signs of damage, namely that one of the forceps arms is broken off.There are no signs of surgery residues.The instrument was visually inspected with the aid of a photomicroscope under various magnifications.The fractured surface on the stump does not show any abnormalities that would indicate a root cause for the breakage.The situation in which the malfunction occurred can no longer be reconstructed, nor can the strain put on the device be determined.Therefore, the customer¿s complaint is confirmed, but the root cause cannot be identified by this investigation.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot numbers, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.A non-conformance based review of the lot number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.Since it was reported that the defect occurred during use of the instrument outside of its intended use, the root cause is identified as ""external - use error"".No actions are required since the defect occurred during use for a purpose not covered by its intended use, which is communicated in the product's dfu.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GRIESHABER MAXGRIP REVOLUTION DSP FORCEPS
Common Device Name
FORCEPS, OPHTHALMIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON GRIESHABER AG
winkelriedstrasse 52
schaffhausen 8203
SZ  8203
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON GRIESHABER AG
winkelriedstrasse 52
schaffhausen 8203
SZ   8203
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key22403628
Report Number3003398873-2025-00316
Device Sequence Number18636377
Product Code HNR
UDI-Device Identifier07612717071292
UDI-Public(01)07612717071292(17)270831(11)240912(10)1724YM
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/04/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number711.13
Device Lot Number1724YM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/09/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/11/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/04/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/04/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/12/2024
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-