|
|
| Catalog Number |
72202745 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Perforation (2001)
|
| Date of Event |
06/11/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an acl repair procedure, the 7-8mm biosure fixation device was broken when the package was opened.The procedure was completed placing a s+n back up device of 9-10 mm.The tibial tunnel was increased in diameter due to the use of the backup 9-10 mm.There was a surgical delay of less than 30 minutes and no further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication related to a product problem with a smith+nephew device.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11 h3, h6 the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed that it is in its original opened packaging.The device is fractured with one fin off the hub.The outer packaging is undamaged.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the work instruction found that the operator should inspect device for integrity and particulate before loading device into pouch.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include an inadvertent impact event that may have occurred during device transportation, rough shipping and handling, or at the customer site, as well as the application of an unintended, inappropriate, or excessive force to the device.Based on this investigation, there is no evidence to suggest a design, material or manufacturing issue.Therefore, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|