|
(b)(4).This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b4, b5, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h11.Visual inspection of the returned ceramic head confirmed the size and the presence of the ceramtec etching.The head was received seated within the polyethylene liner.Dark marks were observed around and inside the taper hole, consistent with metal transfer.The rim of the taper hole was found to be fractured, and one fractured piece was returned with the device.However, not all fragments were recovered.No additional damage was noted during the inspection.The component¿s properties and microstructure met production specifications, showing no pre-existing material defects.Secondary metal transfer marks were found on the femoral head fragments, likely from contact with metal parts or surgical instruments.Uneven primary metal transfer was observed on the bore surface.The fracture originated in region g, where adjacent metal transfer suggests a point or line contact with the metal stem taper.Additional metal transfer on the dome indicates contact with a metal object.The fracture likely resulted from high local stress caused by a point load¿possibly due to a tilted stem taper during impaction or repositioning.A review of the device manufacturing records confirmed no abnormalities or deviations.Review of the complaint history identified additional similar complaints for the reported item and the part and lot combination.Complaints are monitored per complaint trending process in order to identify potential adverse trends.Regarding the fracture evaluation, the damage most likely resulted from high localized stress caused by a point load¿potentially from a tilted stem taper during impaction or repositioning.However, a definitive root cause could not be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|